By Henry Makow PhD

Feminism is an excellent example of how the Rockefeller mega cartel uses the awesome power of the mass media (i.e. propaganda.) to control society.

In 40 short years, many women have lost touch with their natural loving instincts. Consequently, the family is in disarray, sexual depravity is rampant and birth rates have plummeted.

I’ll expand on the Rockefeller’s role, but first we need to remember that for a woman, love is an instinctive act of self-sacrifice.

She gives herself to her husband and children and is fulfilled by seeing them thrive and receiving their love, respect and gratitude.

A woman makes this supreme sacrifice to only one man who will cherish her and provide for his family. Men instinctively want to fulfill this responsibility.

This is the essence of the heterosexual contract (i.e. marriage): female power in exchange for male power expressed as love. Sex is the symbol of this exclusive bond. Marriage and family may not be for everyone but it is the natural path for most.

Feminism has trained women to reject this model as an “old fashioned, oppressive stereotype” even though it reflects their natural instincts.

On Thursday a British writer reported overhearing two young women:

“All men are useless these days,” one said. “Yeah,” said the other. “The trouble is that they haven’t risen to the challenge of feminism. They don’t understand that we need them to be more masculine, and instead they have just copped out.”

That’s their logic? If women are less feminine, men will be more masculine? Men aren’t designed to fight with women. They need to be affirmed by a woman’s acquiescence and faith. When women constantly challenge them, men will “cop out” of marriage and family.

Now that love and marriage have been “discredited,” women have nothing left to exchange for love but sex. Thus, many are unnaturally obsessed with appearance and pathetically give their bodies to all and sundry.

Permanent love is not based on a woman’s sex appeal, or personality or achievements. Ultimately, it is based on self-sacrifice. We love the people who love us.

THE BIG PICTURE: THE CENTRAL BANKERS

People do not realize that feminism is mass indoctrination because they cannot identify the perpetrator, the means or the motive.

Recently Aaron Russo, the producer of Bette Middler’s movies and “America: From Freedom to Fascism” identified all three confirming what I have been saying.

(See this shocking 14 minute interview excerpt)

While trying to recruit Russo for the CFR, Nicholas Rockefeller told him that his family foundation created women’s liberation using mass media control as part of a long-term plan to enslave humanity. He admitted they want to “chip us.” Google “Rockefeller Foundation” and “Women’s Studies” and you’ll get a half million citations.

The hidden goal of feminism is to destroy the family, which interferes with state brainwashing of the young. Side benefits include depopulation and widening the tax base. Displacing men in the role of providers also destabilizes the family.

A drastic paradigm shift is required to make sense of the world. The Rockefellers are part of the private central banking cartel that also controls media, defence, pharmaceutical and other cartels. To protect their monopoly of credit and wealth, they are instituting a world police state (“world government”) using the bogus 9-11 attack and endless war as a pretext. Rockefeller told Russo about this plan a year before 9-11.

The poet Charles Peguy said, “Everything begins in faith and ends in politics.” The banking cartel needs a philosophy to justify enchaining mankind. That philosophy is Satanism. The cartel controls the world through a network of occult societies linked to Freemasonry, Communism, the Vatican and organized Jewry (Bnai Brith, ADL, AJC, Zionism.) The highest occult rank is known as the Illuminati.

Modern Western culture is based on Freemasonry, which teaches that man, and not God determines reality. (Naturally, they need to overrule natural and spiritual laws in order to assert their own control.) They have noticed that people are diffident and malleable creatures who prefer to believe what they are told than rely on their own perception. Thus the media successfully promotes homosexual values that conflict with our natural instincts.

MEDIA ERADICATES LOVE

Every facet of the mass media (movies, TV, magazines, music, commercials, news) is used for social control with the ultimate goal of enslavement. There is a direct connection between what happened in Communist Russia and what is happening in America today. In both cases the central banking cartel is asserting totalitarian control.

The mass media’s function is to distract us from this, and the imminent Iran war and North American Union. Currently the diversion is the global warming fracas.

In order to destroy the family, the media convinced women they could not rely on the heterosexual contract.

Myrna Blyth was the editor in chief of “Ladies Home Journal” from 1981 to 2002. In her book /”Spin Sisters”/ (2004) she says the media sold women “a career in exactly the same drum banging way that the Happy Homemaker had been sold to their mothers.” (38)

The Illuminati undermined women’s natural loving instincts using the following mantras:

1. *Men can no longer be trusted.* Using the “Lifetime Network” as an example, Blyth concluded “all men are 1) unfaithful rats 2) abusive monsters 3) dishonest scumbags, or 4) all of the above. Women on the other hand were…ubervictims [or] flinty achievers who triumph despite the cavemen who…want to keep them in their place.” (62-63)

2. *Women are victims by virtue of their sex.* Blyth says the media sends “one message loud and clear. Because we are women, we remain victims in our private lives, at work, in society as a whole.” (156) Thus women must have a sense of grievance, entitlement and rebellion. The same tactic was used to manipulate Jews, Blacks, workers and gays. (See my “Victim as Moral Zombie”)

3. *Women should be selfish.* “Liberation and narcissism have merged,” Blyth says. Leisure now means, “time for yourself, spent alone, or perhaps with one’s girlfriends but definitely without spouse and kids…Endless articles preached the new feminist gospel, that indulging yourself is an important part of being a healthy, well adjusted woman.” (65)

4. *Sex is not reserved for love and marriage.* Magazines like Glamour and Cosmopolitan urge young women to “put out on their first date,” ogle men openly” and be an athlete in bed. There is no discussion of marriage or family. (160) Such women will not be able to trust any man enough to surrender themselves.

5. *Self-fulfillment lies in career success and not husband and family.* “The social rewards of holding down a job are critical to one’s sense of dignity and self worth,” Betty Friedan pontificated. In fact, “most work is deeply ordinary,” Blyth observes (35-36). (I’m not saying women can’t have jobs, only they shouldn’t be tricked out of having families if they want them.)

Thus many women are schizophrenic as they attempt to reconcile their natural instincts with a constant exhortation to do the opposite. The wreckage — broken families and dysfunctional people — is strewn everywhere.

At the same time, Playboy Magazine etc. aimed a similar message at men. You don’t need to get married to have sex. Marriage and children are a bore.

CONCLUSION

The consistent media drumbeat is organized brainwashing. Society has been totally subverted by the central banking cartel using a Satanic cult, Freemasonry, to select its lackeys. Most masons are unaware of this truth but the owners of the mass media know first-hand.

We used to say, “as American as motherhood and apple pie.” Only Satanists would trash motherhood. Far from empowering women, feminism has unsexed many. It has deprived them of a secure and honored role and reduced them to sex objects and replaceable workers.

Luciferians promote rebellion because they are defying what is natural and healthy. Like their symbol, Lucifer, they wish to play God.

God’s love can be seen in a woman’s dedication to her husband and children. Thus the bankers must destroy it.

By Henry Makow PhD

Feminism is an excellent example of how the Rockefeller mega cartel uses the awesome power of the mass media (i.e. propaganda.) to control society.

In 40 short years, many women have lost touch with their natural loving instincts. Consequently, the family is in disarray, sexual depravity is rampant and birth rates have plummeted.

I’ll expand on the Rockefeller’s role, but first we need to remember that for a woman, love is an instinctive act of self-sacrifice.

She gives herself to her husband and children and is fulfilled by seeing them thrive and receiving their love, respect and gratitude.

A woman makes this supreme sacrifice to only one man who will cherish her and provide for his family. Men instinctively want to fulfill this responsibility.

This is the essence of the heterosexual contract (i.e. marriage): female power in exchange for male power expressed as love. Sex is the symbol of this exclusive bond. Marriage and family may not be for everyone but it is the natural path for most.

Feminism has trained women to reject this model as an “old fashioned, oppressive stereotype” even though it reflects their natural instincts.

On Thursday a British writer reported overhearing two young women:

“All men are useless these days,” one said. “Yeah,” said the other. “The trouble is that they haven’t risen to the challenge of feminism. They don’t understand that we need them to be more masculine, and instead they have just copped out.”

That’s their logic? If women are less feminine, men will be more masculine? Men aren’t designed to fight with women. They need to be affirmed by a woman’s acquiescence and faith. When women constantly challenge them, men will “cop out” of marriage and family.

Now that love and marriage have been “discredited,” women have nothing left to exchange for love but sex. Thus, many are unnaturally obsessed with appearance and pathetically give their bodies to all and sundry.

Permanent love is not based on a woman’s sex appeal, or personality or achievements. Ultimately, it is based on self-sacrifice. We love the people who love us.

THE BIG PICTURE: THE CENTRAL BANKERS

People do not realize that feminism is mass indoctrination because they cannot identify the perpetrator, the means or the motive.

Recently Aaron Russo, the producer of Bette Middler’s movies and “America: From Freedom to Fascism” identified all three confirming what I have been saying.

(See this shocking 14 minute interview excerpt)

While trying to recruit Russo for the CFR, Nicholas Rockefeller told him that his family foundation created women’s liberation using mass media control as part of a long-term plan to enslave humanity. He admitted they want to “chip us.” Google “Rockefeller Foundation” and “Women’s Studies” and you’ll get a half million citations.

The hidden goal of feminism is to destroy the family, which interferes with state brainwashing of the young. Side benefits include depopulation and widening the tax base. Displacing men in the role of providers also destabilizes the family.

A drastic paradigm shift is required to make sense of the world. The Rockefellers are part of the private central banking cartel that also controls media, defence, pharmaceutical and other cartels. To protect their monopoly of credit and wealth, they are instituting a world police state (“world government”) using the bogus 9-11 attack and endless war as a pretext. Rockefeller told Russo about this plan a year before 9-11.

The poet Charles Peguy said, “Everything begins in faith and ends in politics.” The banking cartel needs a philosophy to justify enchaining mankind. That philosophy is Satanism. The cartel controls the world through a network of occult societies linked to Freemasonry, Communism, the Vatican and organized Jewry (Bnai Brith, ADL, AJC, Zionism.) The highest occult rank is known as the Illuminati.

Modern Western culture is based on Freemasonry, which teaches that man, and not God determines reality. (Naturally, they need to overrule natural and spiritual laws in order to assert their own control.) They have noticed that people are diffident and malleable creatures who prefer to believe what they are told than rely on their own perception. Thus the media successfully promotes homosexual values that conflict with our natural instincts.

MEDIA ERADICATES LOVE

Every facet of the mass media (movies, TV, magazines, music, commercials, news) is used for social control with the ultimate goal of enslavement. There is a direct connection between what happened in Communist Russia and what is happening in America today. In both cases the central banking cartel is asserting totalitarian control.

The mass media’s function is to distract us from this, and the imminent Iran war and North American Union. Currently the diversion is the global warming fracas.

In order to destroy the family, the media convinced women they could not rely on the heterosexual contract.

Myrna Blyth was the editor in chief of “Ladies Home Journal” from 1981 to 2002. In her book /”Spin Sisters”/ (2004) she says the media sold women “a career in exactly the same drum banging way that the Happy Homemaker had been sold to their mothers.” (38)

The Illuminati undermined women’s natural loving instincts using the following mantras:

1. *Men can no longer be trusted.* Using the “Lifetime Network” as an example, Blyth concluded “all men are 1) unfaithful rats 2) abusive monsters 3) dishonest scumbags, or 4) all of the above. Women on the other hand were…ubervictims [or] flinty achievers who triumph despite the cavemen who…want to keep them in their place.” (62-63)

2. *Women are victims by virtue of their sex.* Blyth says the media sends “one message loud and clear. Because we are women, we remain victims in our private lives, at work, in society as a whole.” (156) Thus women must have a sense of grievance, entitlement and rebellion. The same tactic was used to manipulate Jews, Blacks, workers and gays. (See my “Victim as Moral Zombie”)

3. *Women should be selfish.* “Liberation and narcissism have merged,” Blyth says. Leisure now means, “time for yourself, spent alone, or perhaps with one’s girlfriends but definitely without spouse and kids…Endless articles preached the new feminist gospel, that indulging yourself is an important part of being a healthy, well adjusted woman.” (65)

4. *Sex is not reserved for love and marriage.* Magazines like Glamour and Cosmopolitan urge young women to “put out on their first date,” ogle men openly” and be an athlete in bed. There is no discussion of marriage or family. (160) Such women will not be able to trust any man enough to surrender themselves.

5. *Self-fulfillment lies in career success and not husband and family.* “The social rewards of holding down a job are critical to one’s sense of dignity and self worth,” Betty Friedan pontificated. In fact, “most work is deeply ordinary,” Blyth observes (35-36). (I’m not saying women can’t have jobs, only they shouldn’t be tricked out of having families if they want them.)

Thus many women are schizophrenic as they attempt to reconcile their natural instincts with a constant exhortation to do the opposite. The wreckage — broken families and dysfunctional people — is strewn everywhere.

At the same time, Playboy Magazine etc. aimed a similar message at men. You don’t need to get married to have sex. Marriage and children are a bore.

CONCLUSION

The consistent media drumbeat is organized brainwashing. Society has been totally subverted by the central banking cartel using a Satanic cult, Freemasonry, to select its lackeys. Most masons are unaware of this truth but the owners of the mass media know first-hand.

We used to say, “as American as motherhood and apple pie.” Only Satanists would trash motherhood. Far from empowering women, feminism has unsexed many. It has deprived them of a secure and honored role and reduced them to sex objects and replaceable workers.

Luciferians promote rebellion because they are defying what is natural and healthy. Like their symbol, Lucifer, they wish to play God.

God’s love can be seen in a woman’s dedication to her husband and children. Thus the bankers must destroy it.

Republished by popular demand

1- Take away the right to own land by instituting the system of Property Tax.

This action effectively turns the would-be landowner into a tenant that is merely renting the land from “The State”.
This action breaks the bond between the “landowner” and the land, never allowing him/her to truly feel a sense of ownership over the land.
This action weakens the bond between ancestor and ancestry by making “The State” the one to bequeath the land, via the probate process, to any heirs. It also reinforces, on a subconscious level, that the land is theirs by permission of “The State” not because of the generosity of their parent/grandparent/etc.

2- Encourage the women that they owe no deference to their husbands and make it easy for them to surpass him in the workplace and academia.

A key component of this step is to teach the woman, via media, academia, and other methods, that masculine authority, or any rule governing a difference in behavior and treatment for women versus men, is synonymous with oppression.

This action, once it has run its course, leaves the woman with little or no respect for her husband. Innately she knows that he should be the provider for her and the family and once she surpasses him in income and prestige, she begins to disrespect him, at first in small ways, then in larger ones, even if neither of them realize it until it is too late.
Once the woman no longer respects the man, then the children who are growing up watching her example, begin to feel less respect for the father also.
Any sons in this type of family will grow up with often expecting and demanding far less respect for themselves than they normally would otherwise do. Their parents have set the bar, and they see no need to exceed it.
Any daughters in this scenario will, more often than not, grow up with a scornful opinion of men in general and, in the event that they do encounter one that is Strong and confident, as he should be, she labels him as “controlling” and “too demanding”. Once again, just as with the son, she is a victim of having seen her parents set a low bar and she will not tolerate any man who seeks to exceed it. There are exceptions to this rule, but they are increasingly rare.
Quite the male, finding himself in such a situation, will undertake drastic measures to re-assert his authority and repair his own tarnished self-image. These may include physical/mental abuse, adultery, alcohol and other drugs, or overspending on such items as clothing, cars, etc.

3- Encourage the children to disrespect their parents, and forbid the parents to discipline them.

The first part of this is most often accomplished through the media. Television shows are created which show the children being openly disobedient and disrespectful of their parents, and even elders in general. These same media sources often depict the parents as clueless, helpless buffoons, who are severely out of touch with their kids, thus fooling the impressionable viewers that this type of behavior is the “norm”.
The second portion of this step is accomplished through the courts and law enforcement primarily, but media outlets may also be used. Laws are passed that increasingly forbid parents from using spanking or any other corporeal punishment to bring wayward children back into line.

4- Instruct the school system to increasingly enroach on the authority of the parents, thus devaluing the parents in the childrens’ eyes.

This is implemented in many different ways. One way is by preventing parents from visiting the classroom unless “arranged in advance”, Another way is to subject the children to mandatory “counseling”, per the discretion of school officials and staff. Children in this case are often asked very intimate details about their home lives and are strongly reminded that if they ever need to talk or report abuse, that the school official “is there”. This effectively is the same as telling the child that their parent is not the true authority over them, the school, which is an arm of The State, is.

5- Devalue marriage as an institution and encourage divorce as a remedy for marital unrest.

This step is perhaps one of the most effective at destroying a society. If couples can be encouraged to stop viewing marriage as a lifelong obligation, once commenced, then this step becomes a most effective tool at breaking family loyalty and pride in lineage.
This step is often accomplished by a savvy mixture of media representation, increased ease of divorce, and via a strong campaign of phychiatrists, counselors, etc., all of whom will eagerly advise women and men alike that the answer to their problems is to “move on”.

6- Discourage religion in everyday and professional life and encourage racial tensions.

On the surface one may assume that religion is best left as a personal matter, and the examples presented by government and media, of Muslim fanatics and Christian Inquisitors, can be a very convincing tool to sway public opinion on this matter. However if a state can succeed in this step they will effectively exclude far more than religious dogma from the public arena. These include: Sexual morality, financial restrictions(usury, etc.), marital encouragement, family unity, self-discipline, the sense of belonging to a group independent of “The State”.
A key component in the implementation of this is to discourage youth from expressing their religious affiliation and from being involved in religion.
Highlighting and encouraging the differences between ethnic and racial groups is a key part of making this work. By promoting one ethnic group over another with consistency, distrust and animosity will rise between them. This technique coupled with the systematic breakdown of religion, which is the glue that would otherwise hold these ethnic groups together , is almost unstoppable.

7- Encourage Sexual Freedoms including Fornication, Adultery, Homosexuality, etc.

This is the 2nd most effective step in this lesson.
By advertising (through music, TV, film, and print) fornication as a socially acceptable activity the strength of the family unit can be utterly decimated. This also helps to devalue the institution of marriage. When the same pleasures that otherwise might be accessible only within a marriage are made freely available, marriage becomes increasingly less attractive as only the restrictions that it implies remain unique to it.
By similar means as those applied for fornication, adultery can be advertised as an acceptable release of tension and in some cases, through counseling and careful media representation, the subject can also see it as a way to “revitalize” a marriage. The true outcome, however, is that both parties within the marriage no longer trust each other, or the opposite sex as a whole. Children within such a family will may similarly follow suit as adults, or at the least they may see it as more acceptable from any future spouses that they may have.
Homosexuality is perhaps the single greatest catalyst for the collapse of a society. A cursory examination through history will show that homosexuality closely preceded the rapid fall of many of the greatest empires in history, like Rome, Babylon, and Greece, for example. Once men begin turning to each other with amorous intention the family unit begins unraveling at an exponential rate.

8- Raise prices to the extent that two incomes become needed to sustain an acceptable quality of life.

This step is key in driving a wedge between the individual family members, thus ensuring that family loyalty is duly diminished.
By forcing the wife to go out and work it will often break the bond between her and her children, and even between her and her husband. As the mother is increasingly unavailable children will turn their affection, questions, and even their free time to other sources. These may include the media, alcohol, inappropriate activities with peers, and more. This also breaks her of her routine of caring for and comforting the husband and the children.
The rigors of the workplace will often harden the disposition of the woman to the extent that she ceases to be a comfort to her husband and children and instead becomes a competitor to the husband and an unfamiliar cohabitant to the children.

9- Debt

By making credit easily available to those who want it, it becomes very easy to raise prices far higher than all but the elite can afford to buy without a loan. Real Estate is indicative of this. Do you really think that it takes more wood to build a house today than it did 50 years ago? If it takes the same amount of wood, and trees take the same amount of water and need the same amount of soil, then ask yourself why homes are more than 25 times the cost that they were 50 years ago in some markets.
By making it desirable, or even needed for a family to take loans for homes, cars, even for clothing and other essentials of life, the responsible parties are easily convinced to put the yoke of indentured servitude around their necks.
By careful management of which sectors of society will have access to credit at which levels, it becomes easy to elevate or debase one racial group or another, and even to control which geographical areas will prosper in any given period.
However, underlying factor is that individuals in the society will become increasingly powerless even as their self images become more and more grandiose. The slave will think himself a master and will love “The State” for making him so.

10- Democracy

By instituting democracy, power is effectively reduced, and no one person is able to gain too much power. In the old days of true monarchs, boys were groomed from childhood to rule, so that by the time they assumed the mantle, they were old hands at the “Great Game”(politics). Under democracy it is rare that anyone will stay in power long enough to gain this level of competence.
Democracy, and the “protection” of it, is a key tool to keep governments friendly the greater power in authority. In the event that any citizens try to assert themselves to throw off the “oppressor”, they can be prosecuted, killed, or similarly neutralized as the enemies of democracy.
Through the funding of democracy the greater power is able to control who wins elections. In practice the “friendly party” is given an overwhelming amount of funding while the funds of the unfriendly party are curtailed.
Even more preferable than the last point is to control which candidates are presented for election. Thus even in the event that the people choose in a way that the greater power does not expect, the ultimate choice will still be a client to the greater power.

In the end democracy, thus instituted, will do the exact opposite of what the name implies (demo=people, cracy=rule). The true power will reside with whomever is wealthy enough, and savvy enough, to manipulate the electoral process. The unfortunate citizens will think themselves fortunate, all the while not knowing that their choices have been made for them in advance.
Now after having read this ask yourself: Where have you seen all of these rules used…..